My Photo

My Other Accounts

Delicious Facebook FriendFeed Last.fm LinkedIn MySpace Other... Other... Other... StumbleUpon Tumblr Twitter YouTube
check out the befuddled swicki at eurekster.com

  • LOOSE-LEAF LIVING New DEMO website!

  • Befuddledphotos_2

Links & Friends

Funky Friends

Feeds

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

..........................


  • :: Submissions ::
  • Subscribe to blog
    subscription
  • Subscribe to podcast
    podsafe music network

------------------------------

« DoJ Asks Court to Nix Google Book Search Settlement | Epicenter | Wired.com | Main | Gates: Mistake to set Afghan withdrawal timelines - USATODAY.com »

Thursday, 24 September 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Karen Quah

If we agree to disagree, can we still be friends?

I'm sure the initial operation was designed to last a short period of time. I can't imagine Bush entered it thinking, we're going to stay here longer than both World Wars combined. Shock and Awe still discounts the difference of terrain, mindset, culture...

Whatever the strategy was, it highlights the arrogance of the Bush administration in thinking the eradication of "terrorism" would be as easy as marching into both Iraq and Afghanistan, saving the civilian population from their respective regimes, and emerging heroes of the free world. When will they ever learn?

I do agree with you however on the invasion of Iraq - it should never have happened - and the awesomeness of the military folk. Both in the US and allied countries. I cannot begin to imagine the courage and sacrifice of these people and their loved ones. They are also in my thoughts.

Tim Null

Karen, I doubt our friendship could be in jeopardy. Not unless you're a Republican! (Just kidding, I have a Republican friend!)

Do we really disagree?

You want the US military to get out of Afghanistan.
I want the US military to get out of Afghanistan.

See, we're in full agreement! TGIF! ;)

Joking aside, I'd love to have the US military out of Afghanistan, but, as I stated above, I don't see it happening before the next US Presidential election.

Why do I think this? Let me put it in plain English. If President Obama returns Afghanistan to the Taliban, he'll lose the next election, it's just that simple.

But nothing is set in granite. The political climate could change, and Obama might withdraw the troops as some sort of "October surprise" during the next Presidential election. And, of course, if the military families turn against the war, and march on Washington, the whole political landscape will totally be altered to such a degree that all bets will be off.

Karen Quah

You have a Republican friend? Lol, how open-minded of you.

Okay, agree to agree.

President Obama is in a non-enviable lose-lose position. If he returns Afghanistan to Taliban, he loses support. If he stays in Afghanistan and goes for main option which seems to be an increase in troop numbers, he also loses support.

What is interesting of late is that like his allies, he has remained comparatively silent with regards to the situation and his intentions. I guess we shall have to wait and see.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment